tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6887254246370653376.post6530306717804903058..comments2023-09-25T02:51:41.510-07:00Comments on Sahidic Coptic Insight on NT Verses: The Coptic Version and Theological QuestionsMemrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00576135299193837482noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6887254246370653376.post-15883651095152378482020-01-02T13:45:14.848-08:002020-01-02T13:45:14.848-08:00The Cpotic Sahidica Text which I've got reads ...The Cpotic Sahidica Text which I've got reads in two way. In one Text, “je”(that)is after “today”, and in another one, “je” is before “today. In the Warren Wells' Sahidica text, “je”(that)is after “today”.("Sahidica - A New Edition of the New Testament in Sahidic Coptic" 2000-2007, p.222/644;“http://www.biblical-data.org/coptic/Sahidic_NT.pdf”)So, if you know the manuscript of the best Sahidica Text, please load up. In the Web above, the manuscript on the luke is “PPalau Rib. Inv.Nr.181 collated against Pierpont Morgan Library M-569”, but, this is not on the Wikipedia. I guess that “M-569”is the original. According to a Web, the “PPalau Rib. Inv.Nr.181” contains complete Text of Luke and Mark in Sahidic.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14627908080704072393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6887254246370653376.post-56415336595194536642020-01-02T11:44:44.491-08:002020-01-02T11:44:44.491-08:00I've got the Warren Wells' Sahidica text f...I've got the Warren Wells' Sahidica text from Internet. And I want to know which is the best Sahidic Text which you said. There are several manuscripts dated at 4th century.(Wikipedia) But I could'nt get these text. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14627908080704072393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6887254246370653376.post-88413976595210046242018-06-29T07:10:48.506-07:002018-06-29T07:10:48.506-07:00Hello, I would like to know from the source for th...Hello, I would like to know from the source for the texts of the COPTO for the Old Testament, a URL, if I had one, dictionaries and a more reliable Coptic grammar book, if you could pass that data to me.<br /><br />I'm Spanish speaking, it's very hard to findIsrael Castillohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00952906624654103969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6887254246370653376.post-6271380318550678922018-06-29T07:07:56.489-07:002018-06-29T07:07:56.489-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Israel Castillohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00952906624654103969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6887254246370653376.post-45298781355780939102014-01-31T12:36:54.959-08:002014-01-31T12:36:54.959-08:00Even though the Coptic Bible supports the beliefs ...Even though the Coptic Bible supports the beliefs of Jehovah's Witness's, they made their conclusions originally from the Greek text which means that there is proof in the Greek text itself.<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05943049601452155294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6887254246370653376.post-91166333985172200872012-07-22T06:02:54.616-07:002012-07-22T06:02:54.616-07:00Excuse me but I am not sure where to post my quest...Excuse me but I am not sure where to post my questions and I may have posted this question somewhere else in your blogs, <br /><br />But does the Coptic (P Chester Beatty-813) have the book of Mark? - Does it have the long- short or no ending? just the “cliff hanger”? And Where can we find more information on the oldest Armenian (?)manuscripts, "The 99 out of one-hundred that do not contain the long ending”? <br /><br />Anyway I have great trust in our Bible and the organization- that keeps sticking to the truth-no matter where it goes... they try to help us see the variations and disputations... they never lie to us- or tickle our ears. Truth, they keep sticking to it. And I am so glad the Coptic just continues to verify the truth! <br /><br />Thank you very much.Trishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01839450884134890062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6887254246370653376.post-49062299066299213072010-12-04T21:17:28.904-08:002010-12-04T21:17:28.904-08:00what do you make of the textual variant in 2 Pet 1...what do you make of the textual variant in 2 Pet 1:1? <br /><br />Evidence Scribes saw a GS construction and didn't like it? The Divine Name was there and scribes went different ways to "fix" it?internethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14549118197380603866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6887254246370653376.post-67299425367066597152010-04-11T22:32:44.206-07:002010-04-11T22:32:44.206-07:00May Jehovah continue to bless you.May Jehovah continue to bless you.Andrew James Couzenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10895472203045951588noreply@blogger.com